Sunday, September 25, 2005

Survivor: Discussion #2

Okay, so I took a little break. But here's the good part: Survivor: Discussion is back! Last Thursday, though battling heat and stupidity, the Nakum tribe managed to win the reward challenge and immunity. By the way, I thought that the mud-tug-of-war-capture-the-flag challege was the stupidest idea they've ever come up with, and there's been some stupid ideas. Anyhoo, Morgan was cut, much to Stephanie's chagrin, for S thought M would be useful in challenges; Gary felt that Morgan was lazy and "didn't do much work around camp." This seemed stupid logic to me, for Steph is correct in thinking that if they have more members they will have a better chance of winning. You need to win immunity for that and little Lydia might indeed be a liability down the road, no matter how many minnows she catches. For all of Morgan's laziness, she may have been stronger in the end. What does Gary think the camp should be, a Holiday Inn? I think he's next to go, which would go against my earlier advice, but I'm sticking to it.

1 comment:

amie said...

Thanks for the update G! I agree, there is no logic in voting out lazy but strong players until much farther along in the game. You gotta take out the weaklings first (says me, the biggest weakling out of anyone!).